Community representatives have welcomed the refusal to accept the Environment Plan for the proposed Regia 3D marine seismic survey, describing the outcome as a significant moment for environmental standards, Indigenous stewardship, and public participation in regulatory processes.
The decision confirms that the plan did not meet the acceptance criteria under Australia’s offshore environmental regulations following assessment and opportunities for revision.
Local community advocate Ben Druitt said the outcome demonstrates both persistence from stakeholders and the strength of environmental safeguards.
“For years we were told this project wasn’t a question of if — only how and when. Today the answer is clear: never.”
“This outcome reflects sustained effort from communities, councils, citizen scientists, and Indigenous custodians standing up for Sea Country.”
“It also shows the system working — the regulator determined the plan did not meet required standards even after opportunities to address deficiencies.”
Druitt emphasised that the result should not be framed as opposition to development, but as an expectation of responsible practice.
“This isn’t about opposing industry. It’s about expecting modern standards, strong science, and genuine community engagement.”
“Responsible development earns trust by meeting those expectations, and this decision shows those expectations have real consequences.”
He highlighted the role of Indigenous leadership throughout the process.
“Indigenous custodians stood firm for Sea Country, grounding the conversation in stewardship and responsibility to place and future generations.”
Druitt also pointed to advances in ecological understanding as shaping expectations for environmental planning.
“Our knowledge of marine ecosystems — including the prey systems that support whales — continues to improve. Environmental planning must evolve alongside that science.”
“Seismic blasting reflects an older exploration model. Practices that cannot demonstrate acceptable ecosystem protection increasingly belong in the past.”
While welcoming the decision, he stressed the importance of continued oversight.
“This is a step forward, not the finish line. Protecting marine ecosystems requires ongoing vigilance and engagement.”
Druitt said the broader significance extends beyond a single proposal.
“Refusals are uncommon, which makes this outcome meaningful. It signals that scrutiny matters, standards matter, and participation in regulatory processes matters.”
“Healthy oceans support wildlife, culture, tourism, and regional economies. Protecting them ultimately protects communities.”
